jcsbimp01: my user icon taken in 2014 (Default)
"Manipulation in the name of religion" is a matter of great concern to me, particularly as it relates to the Radical Right and to Trumpism, but it is also a subject I need to define precisely before I can talk rightly about it. It is an odd concept, I think, to people who do not profess or follow any particular faith or spiritual practice. When we consider that religion deals primarily with matters of faith, morality, or spirit, rather than observable, demonstrable principles and even the thought processes associated with reason and deduction, it is curious in a way to make a claim that the adherents of this or that faith or practice have been manipulated. "Well yes," a skeptic might say, "they've been manipulated into believing something not provable in the first place!" So any assertion that some religious practitioners/ believers are more manipulated than others, or that a particular denomination or type of religious person might be more susceptible to manipulation, might require distinguishing further the particular manipulation to which it refers.

In the case of Evangelical Trumpism, this distinction is fairly clear in my mind: The Protestant Christian tradition does not by definition make assertions that are provably not so. Or at least, the claims it makes and the values it teaches are not centered on objectively disputable claims. Yes, historic and scientific scholarship can find many faults in fact with the millennia-old observations of both Old and New Testament sacred texts. But I am not talking about these kinds of factual disputations. What I call manipulation, and its basis in asserting that which is not so, is willful misrepresentation by Evangelical Protestant leaders of what Biblical texts essentially mean, and what their stated principles imply for moral growth and ethical behavior, including how they do interact with bodies of objectively established knowledge.

The sense the Christian church has as a whole of how to reconcile ancient Biblical ideas and notions with modern scientific discovery and historical scholarship is a sense of the need to reconcile what we once believed with what we now know, or feel confident in accepting as fact. In contrast to this, the Evangelical schools of Christian thought that I call manipulative repeatedly doubt, question, and deny many of the discoveries of scientists and historians, even flatly rejecting the intellectual reasoning processes that support much modern thought and objective observation. Leaders of these religious groups consider the newer, more objectively established findings to be symptoms of evil, heathen, or politically biased indoctrination of society: itself a form of manipulation. At least, that is what appears on the surface to motivate what and how they teach/preach.

But we can dig deeper in searching out why certain sects do this, and I think I have discovered some plausible motivations. As with many other problems of modern societies and reasons for manipulating or deceiving their members, one can find some answers initially by Following The Money.

When we examine the religious movements in American Evangelical Christianity that most visibly dovetailed their doctrine and societal interaction with GOP political tenets, particularly those of the Radical Right and the "Moral Majority," we see a set of beliefs and practices that put great stock in "traditional American values" and a love of God and Country in harmony with this. The sacredness of the birth process, of traditional marriage and gender roles, and of keeping oneself "unstained by the world" are central to this. The "other" is seen as a threat, and the religion-politics divide does not keep many or most of them from seeing America as a Christian Nation, one that should be kept so.

But what do we not see as guidelines for ethical behavior and moral character in those churches' teachings? For one example, their aforementioned scorn of science and intellectualism rejects new scientific information about what racial differences genuinely are, how industrialization and its resultant pollution threaten our planet, what are the biological forces behind gender identity and sexuality, and how old the Earth and the Universe are, as well as historical information on how human society began, how religion developed, and what were the forces behind war, conquest, and enslavement of human beings by other human beings.

What are the reasons for Christian churches to ignore or shun these matters, wrapped up as they are in concepts of right and wrong arguably as important as an embryo's right to life, the sacredness of marriage, or the need to have a government explicitly based on Christian principles? An answer may be found in identifying who might be threatened by an evolving moral sense with a greater knowledge of science, history, and the interconnectedness and diversity that benefit all of humanity.

Who might be threatened? People and organizations built to profit from traditional knowledge and values are endangered, in their view, from challenging those traditions. Dig deeper. Certain values held in certain ways by the populace as a whole benefit certain people and organizations, and they rise to the top in terms of wealth and power. Those who benefit in tangible ways from society's movements want to keep benefiting, and those with enough wealth and power have, through that wealth and power, the means to satisfy that want. But new ideas and sensibilities, manifest in America by evolving notions of equality, diversity, and interconnectedness, along with greater knowledge of what benefits and harms life on Planet Earth, threaten many established values that profited the White Male Landowners (and slave owners) of past centuries, that justified the exile and genocide of Native tribes in the name of our "Manifest Destiny," and that protect the coffers of today's corporate heads, industrialists, and investment bankers.

Dr. Ibram X. Kendi has shown how racist ideas took root when planted by preachers and pundits funded by the shrewd and powerful beneficiaries of the spread of such ideas: the captains of industry and empire. I believe it is the ideological descendants, if not many of the financial heirs, to that industrial, imperial wealth and power, that have more than enough motive and means to manipulate millions of gullible religious minds in America today, in the Twenty-First Century, just as they did in our centuries past. And the damage done by these same shrewd and powerful becoming overconfident and advancing what became the Trumpist agenda, based quite predictably in racism, anti-intellectualism, sexism, and anti-environmentalism, can only disappear if we wake up from our gullibility and work together to fight forces that try to manipulate the faithful by indoctrinating them in what is demonstrably not so.

jcsbimp01: my user icon taken in 2014 (Default)
[copied from a post I made elsewhere]

I think about the different forces that shape what messages get to us, how, and why. In particular this morning, some remarks on other posts have me thinking about religion and how its message gets spread.
 
One person's post mentioned having to clarify, conversationally, "Classic Jesus or Republican Jesus?" My philosophical and analytical mind started running with that, and I don't believe such a clarification goes far enough... and I also think that to "go far enough" would shake some very basic foundations in at least my life, possibly many others. But then, if a foundation is shaky, it might bear investigating why. So if you're curious, follow along with me here.
 
I firmly believe I had no control over where and when I was born. I tend to think that is true of everyone. And "everyone" is spread over millennia of history and even many years before that, not to mention many continents and cultures. But where and when a person is born has great bearing on not just what he learns about the world, but also how he learns to think about it. Our culture influences our perspectives on everything. (With this and many other statements I'm making here, I invite anyone who sees it as a clear untruth to point it out and give your reasons.)
 
"The civilized world" so named by those successful enough to have published their opinions and had those opinions taught widely, shaped language development and cultural development and how information is seen and shared among its members. The most widespread messages, and the most-used methods for spreading those messages, were the most popular ones.
 
Stick with me. This is the important bit.
 
What you or I learned, or can learn today, as truth depends on where you and I were born, where we live now, and what messages are available to us for figuring out how to filter and process an immense amount of published, traditional, verbal, and non-verbal information, some of it designed for the purpose of letting us know who we are, where we are in the grand scheme of existence, and what we might need to be ready to do with our lives - our purpose.
 
What about religion? Certainly it concerns itself with the most important of these concepts of identity and purpose. But - aha! - the religion we get the opportunity to learn also depends on where we were born, what has been popular in the area where we were born, and the family values into which we had the circumstance to be born. And I think we could have been born anywhere, or at any time.
Religion itself, in fact, can deal with even these observations. I know the religion in which I grew up, Southern Baptist Christianity, definitely dealt with it. Divine will and intention, an overarching plan for every single life form, a heavenly caring and compassion for each organism and the circumstances it will encounter ... all of these teach some of us, and teach us strongly, that our birth and our religion and the culture that instills our values is anything besides random and circumstantial. It is deliberate, it is known, and, in some sense, it is as it should be.
 
We then are left to extrapolate, if we are so inclined (and it appears that I am, for weal or for woe, so inclined), whether that is identically true for the many other beings on this planet, throughout time and space, whatever the culture and values and religion into which they might have been born.
 
The messages I or you grew up learning were most important are influenced by laws of large numbers - probability laws - in this, unless that Divine will and intention I mentioned is so powerful and so deliberately active as to set such laws aside when it comes to the matter of which message gets to which organism and how it affects that organism's life.
 
Religion, science, history - all kinds of knowledge ranging from objective to speculative ... and even to manipulative presentations of information (hang in there!) ... gets to you and me at least partially based on how likely it is to get to you and me, and this has to do, at least somewhat, with the sheer number of organisms or their message-spreading mechanisms that are putting that knowledge out.
We get the truths - the information and the presentations of such - that we are most numerically likely to get, based on where and when it is our fortune to exist.
 
American Christians get the Jesus information that gets to us, just like anybody gets the information about anything (again, that hugely powerful Divine will and intention aside - can/should you push something like that aside for argument's sake? think of the billions of others in other eras and cultures before you answer that). And powerful forces have shaped that information - that culture-shaping, society-forming, brother-and-sisterhood-bonding information - all down through the centuries that a religion formed in Jesus Christ's name has existed.
 
This is why, when talking about American values and Christian values, I've often dared to use the words "manipulative" and "exploitation." Because you see, in this country, who spreads the messages the farthest is who makes them the most popular, and who becomes the most powerful is who controls the most powerful messages - and, through them, the cultures and values and practices ... and, yes, religious beliefs ... of the most people.
 
And that gets right back down to you and me. The messages and values that found us were influenced by what was likely to find us. They may or may not resemble what we think they are supposed to be beyond that.
 
This is why scientists and historians and libraries and books are as important in considering Divine stuff, even our holiest of principles, as priests and preachers and the 700 Club... and even the President.


jcsbimp01: my user icon taken in 2014 (Default)
Those who take the Bible as being, among other descriptors, a book of literally true history encounter a rude awakening when confronted with actual evidence from what we know about human history.

Faced with this, if we dig in, plant our feet, and say that it's scholarship, knowledge, or the academic/scientific/research world which is in erorr, well, we're missing any constructive point about what truth in religious tradition is supposed to be.

It's not about the literal and historical fidelity of people long ago without science and history developed like it is today, without even a sense of there being categories we now call "fiction" and "non-fiction" in the stories they said were important and "true."

I'm going to have to go back to something I read several years ago by a Theosophist, Annie Besant. I don't claim Theosophy as an ideology to which I adhere. But I did see something she wrote that really resonated with me. She wrote it over a half-century before I was born. She said there were several different types of Truth, the historical/scientific/literal truth being in some way the shallowest one, the most facile and least meaningful way to understand something, especially something written. Metaphorical, symbolic, hidden, and spiritual truths exist, and most strongly in religious discussion, or even in religious texts. Getting hung up over whether "it really happened" is getting hung up over a lot of barriers distracting and distancing us from actual deeper truths to which these old, pre-scientific-method, pre-historic-scholarship texts attest.

As the literalists seem to also suffer from a lot of cognitive dissonance - witness in particular the supporters of Tangerine Godzilla in the White House - perhaps we should take a warning from their example and not get so caught up in literalism that we drown our brains in the bathwater with the baby. Whether or not he was really, truly, actually born in Bethlehem.

There's still a lot of truth in the Bible - truth is to be found in abundance, in fact, in many or all sacred texts. We just need to be less like mindless sheep, grazing without an eye for anything but the obvious. And yes, we can still choose which religious teachings have the greatest ring of truth to our ears and hearts, even sharing what we've learned and what has blessed us with others. But recognize that the literalistic path has so often, and not only in the Christian faiths, been used by those in power to manipulate, enslave, exile, or kill others. When you wield "truth" that way, it comes across as the blunt instrument you've made it. And you hurt yourself as much as you hurt others with it.
jcsbimp01: my user icon taken in 2014 (Default)
Manipulate the gullible.

This seemed always and openly a tactic of some businessmen and their organizations. Some even became famous for it. And we laugh at it.

Now I see that it's emerging just how coordinated, how intentional, how clever, and how extensive this deliberate manipulation has been. It is not nearly so funny in the age of Putin and Trump. For when this kind of business person or organization manipulates a citizenry, both politics and religion get involved, because many lawmakers and preachers have found there is good money to be made, and a secure power base to be established, in manipulation.

For preachers, it's fleecing the flock, even if it is not also misrepresenting the religion. Some would argue it has always been organized religion's secret purpose. That argument, frankly, does not lack credible evidence.

For politicians, it's turning Government by the People into a scrupulously maintained, decades-long scam. For some, it has always been such, and the perpetrators of the scam, and their heirs and sycophants, are not about to stop, the principles of the Founding Fathers be damned.

It is not a tactic, and perhaps never truly has been. It is a strategy.

Profile

jcsbimp01: my user icon taken in 2014 (Default)
jcsbimp01

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
1011121314 1516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 08:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios